News

Differences and Principles of PAC (Polyanionic Cellulose) and CMC (Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose) in Oil Drilling Applications

I. Differences in Molecular Structure and Principles

1. CMC (Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose): Raw material: cotton linters/wood cellulose, modified by etherification with chloroacetic acid:

Degree of substitution (DS): Generally 0.6–0.8, uneven distribution of substituent groups.

Few hydrophilic carboxymethyl groups on the molecular chain, scattered arrangement.

Relies solely on carboxyl groups for water absorption and clay adsorption; weak salt and calcium resistance framework.

2. PAC (Polyanionic Cellulose): An upgraded product of highly substituted, homogeneous CMC, etherified using a special process:

DS ≥ 0.9, some high-end products can reach 1.0–1.2.

Anionic groups are highly uniformly distributed along the long cellulose chain.

Stronger molecular chain rigidity, thicker hydration film, significantly improved resistance to ionic shock.

Essentially: PAC is refined, highly homogeneous, highly substituted CMC; they are not completely different substances, but the processing quality is vastly different.

II. Comparison of Mechanisms of Action (Drilling Fluid Systems)

1. Mechanism for Reducing Filtration Loss

Both operate on the same principle: After dissolving in water, the polymer chains adsorb onto the surface of bentonite, drill cuttings, and wellbore shale, bridging particles and compressing them to form a dense, thin mud cake, preventing the liquid phase from penetrating the formation.

The difference lies in stability:

CMC: When encountering calcium, magnesium, or sodium ions, the carboxyl groups are easily shielded by metal ions, causing the polymer to shrink, resulting in a thicker mud cake and a surge in filtration loss.

PAC: With uniform substitution, multiple anionic sites simultaneously adsorb metal ions, making it less prone to overall shrinkage; the mud cake remains dense even in high-salt, high-calcium environments.

2. Viscosity Enhancement and Propellant Carrying Mechanism

Polymer hydration expands the molecular chains, increasing the viscosity and dynamic shear force of the liquid phase, suspending drill cuttings.

PAC-HV molecules have higher extensibility, resulting in a viscosity far exceeding that of ordinary CMC at the same dosage; PAC-LV molecules undergo viscosity-controlled modification, almost entirely reducing water loss and minimizing thickening.

Ordinary CMC exhibits large viscosity fluctuations, with viscosity dropping rapidly in brine, easily leading to sand settling during drilling stoppages.

3. Shale Inhibition and Collapse Prevention Mechanism: Polymers encapsulate clay particles, preventing water molecules from entering the shale crystal layer and expanding.

CMC has a thin coating, making it prone to detachment in high-salt environments.

PAC has stronger uniform anionic adsorption, resulting in a more robust coating layer and better inhibition of shale hydration and exfoliation.

4. Temperature and Biodegradation Resistance:

CMC molecules generally have low stability, with performance significantly decreasing above 120℃; they are easily decomposed and rendered ineffective by mud bacteria.

PAC has a regular molecular structure, withstanding temperatures up to 140-160℃; it resists microbial erosion and is less prone to deterioration in deep wells and long-term circulation.

III. Differences in Actual Drilling Applications

1. PAC-LV (Low-viscosity polyanionic cellulose)

Features: Minimal viscosity increase, focused on filtration control; resistant to saturated brine, calcium intrusion, and seawater.

Suitable for: Offshore drilling, high-salt formations, high-density heavy mud, reservoir completion fluids, and drilling conditions requiring low viscosity and rapid drilling.

Disadvantages: Weak viscosity increase; requires the addition of xanthan gum and bentonite when mud suspension is poor.

2. PAC-HV (High-viscosity polyanionic cellulose)

Features: High viscosity, combined with filtration reduction, strong sand-carrying capacity.

Suitable for: Medium-deep onshore wells, directional wells, shallow loose and easily collapsible formations, and water-based drilling fluids.

Cost-effectiveness: Less thickener added, simplified formulation.

3. Ordinary CMC (Industrial/Drilling Grade) CMC (Chemical Molecular Control)

Advantages: Inexpensive, sufficient for shallow freshwater wells

Disadvantages: Salinity drops drastically with high performance; rapid high-temperature failure; prone to fermentation, short mud storage period; unstable mud cake quality, prone to thickening, high frictional resistance

Suitable for: Shallow freshwater wells, farmland drilling, low-cost shallow exploration wells; generally suitable for offshore, deep, and high-salinity wells

IV. Simple Summary of Selection

Nearshore, overseas projects, brine wells, deep wells, directional wells → PAC is necessary

Shallow onshore freshwater wells, limited budget → CMC can be used to reduce costs

For low mud viscosity and water loss control → PAC-LV

For increasing viscosity, including sand, while controlling water loss → PAC-HV